There are many kinds of viruses on the Internet. All of them pose as something they are not.
And then there are the mind viruses that are destructive only when they force you to take actions you otherwise would not, which is the message’s only purpose.
None of these work if you know about them and can ignore the mind viruses or automate your computer to ignore them. Both actions inoculate yourself against the viruses’ effects.
The cost of spreading these viruses is low but they can infect the globe. No wonder it’s irresistible to create and propagate them – ours is an Attention Economy, and we all want to make an impression even if we can’t make a million.
The Internet has exposed a class of irritating attention-getters that we’ve lived with forever but never saw in such clear relief: that most business and political activities are not about profit but about vying for the spotlight. We’re preternaturally anxious to get others’ attention. We assume we’ll figure out how to profit from that attention once we have it. This was the theme of the DotCom bubble, where no one worried too much about real earnings, as long as the multitudes believed enough to invest in the attention itself.
For viruses designed to get your money, the model is to set up a company to be the recipient of funds (from customers or investors) and which the founders and early investors can profit from. From the perspective of the macro economy, such an enterprise is simply an accounting system, into which one invests time or money and out of which one hopes to harvest more money than the investment costs us.
Accounting Systems are Proprietary Too
Previously we explored the striking proposition that proprietary data is the root of tyranny, and has been since the Sumerians invented the first data base in or about 3246 BC. The insult is further compounded by the harsh truth that, search though we might, we can’t find a single instance of a data base that is not proprietary.
That figures – the pecking order constricts us all, whereby each of us is someone else’s tyrant, and data is simply a way to enforce the pecking order. So we would expect those who are subject to the data to be the peckee, and the dick who keeps the data to be the pecker. (Really, I’m not making this stuff up).
Would we expect any less from the special kind of database called an accounting system? That’s where the juice is in the macro economy, which is simply an immense collection of interlocking accounting systems investing in each other in the hope of future returns. Hell, we’ll even invest in the appearance of an accounting system if the potential reward is great enough, including state lotteries and Nigerian money laundering schemes.
The Subversiveness of a Non-Proprietary Accounting System
We’ve previously described an architecture for a non-proprietary cooperative accounting system which stores matching, non-repudiable transactional data on the web servers of both the buyer and the seller in a transaction. If invoked, the architecture creates the first unmanaged accounting system which saves it from the fate of yesterday’s HumanTech example.
Once we start down the non-proprietary design path, we’re in unfamiliar territory. By definition, there can be no edge given to one party in the transaction over the other. That design decision frees us from the huge intellectual overhead of scheming against the customers of our accounting system and lets us use the freed-up cycles to design a mutually rewarding system.
This has never been possible before, since there’s never been symmetrical (non-proprietary) data before. Once we start designing for both parties, we have the economic equivalent of cold fusion.
Imagine a world where some large minority of the population believes it can outwit the rest of the population and grab a disproportionate share of the goodies. Further, assume a small minority that actually does outwit the rest of the players, especially including the large minority outwitting the majority. It’s a set of Russian dolls, really, with ever-smaller groups benefitting from the collection activities of the slightly more numerous but less skilled toll collectors around them.
The world you’re imagining is the one you live in, and if you believe you’re close to the center of this dance, then you’re as naive as the honest, hard-working Christians who think the Republican leadership is on their side.
The subversive nature of our proposed non-proprietary, unmanaged accounting system is that, unlike every other accounting system in history, it actually does what it says it will do. By its open nature, every promise is recorded and every action displayed, right down to the transaction level. The only challenge is to design the right algorithms and to come up with the kind of viral rewards system designed into yesterday’s HumanTech example.
How is this model subversive? When the entire world is based on a hierarchy where the better informed perpetually extract resources from the less informed, the ultimate subversive act is to break the extraction system. We’ve never had a global, interconnected Meme Machine before, but the Internet is exactly that. There’s no way to get the current players to change their M.O. overnight. But if we just get a tiny microeconomy together and provide the right viral mechanism, then the micreconomy can start to steal transactions from the outmoded economy, as we’ll describe tomorrow.